I got into an argument the other day with a man on another blog about healthcare reform and the role of personal choice in prevention. Our argument centered around the obesity epidemic, his being that people largely have little control over their weight and it is the result of their socio-economic status and the neighborhood they live in with it's accompanying lifestyle. 

My reflex response was "WHAT?!?!?!" However, I knew what he was referencing. There have been a number of social studies conducted that draw a correlation between lower incomes and the greater incidence of obesity. There are also studies showing that people in areas such as New York City that are more likely to walk than drive anywhere are more prone to leanness than those who must drive everywhere. 

I agreed with him that some policies were to blame for the ease of acquiring junk food (i.e. the ridiculous subsidies to Big Corn...) and that exercise as a choice was more difficult than exercise as a necessity. But in the end, 

"There is no iron fist forcing a twinky wielding hand into a complacent mouth. There is no infinite weight chaining someone to a recliner next to a six pack of Bud heavies and a TV dinner. There is no mandate forcing someone to order pizza rather than bake some chicken and steam some broccoli. Our society has made it increasingly easy to eat garbage on a regular basis (which is where I fault our broken policies); but in the end, only you have the final say about what goes into your mouth."

I hate studies like the ones I mentioned above because they give people the green light to surrender their health to the state, to chance, to genetics, to their neighborhood, or whatever. There are a million reasons to neglect your health; none of those take away your choice to be healthy. Our society loves to play the blame game, but I'm here to remind you that the responsibility is yours. 

Actions: Permalink | Comments RSS comment feed |

Post Rating

Comments

Terrilee
# Terrilee
Monday, October 26, 2009 1:27 PM
Excellent Michael....nicely written. It always comes down to what "you" choose to do. You can eat crap or you can eat healthy food. You can be sick or you can be healthy. Many people don't want to hear the truth about the fungus link. It saddens me, some people don't even want to do their own research on the subject. I am forever grateful to Doug Kaufmann....I pray daily that everyone else will listen to him and follow his advice. Don't you think your health and life are worth it!!!!!
Thanks,
Terri McCann
maryleej
# maryleej
Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:26 AM
I agree, however I believe with knowledge is power. We must be teaching the correctt information. Take a look at the Food Pyramid! It's a joke!
Getting the soda and junkfood machines out of the schools is a start, but
take a look at what is served in every cafeteria!
FredaD
# FredaD
Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:58 AM
Maryleej, I agree with you on the USDA Food Pyramid....it is high in grains & fruits & milk & low on proteins & fats. And yet school nutrition (?) programs must use this guideline in order to receive reimbursement for free & reduced price lunches. A child must put on his plate 2 grains, a milk, small amount of protein & lots of fruit & a veggie. Now the government is involved & our children are becoming obese & developing a taste for fast & processed foods because school's cannot afford the cost of the hours it takes to prepare real food as opposed to the more time efficient processed foods. Candies & pop were taken out of the machines. What's acceptable? Juices & flavored waters (lots of sugar or artificial sweetener) pop tarts (qualify as a fruit & bread item) cereal bars (have you read the ingredients on them?), peanuts, peanut butter crackers and the like. Sounds real good. I know our school dietician has a good heart & the best in mind for our children, but government guidelines box her & her thinking in.
palmtree
# palmtree
Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:19 AM
Wouldn't it be interesting to have just one school test market a different dietary program for 5 years and see if there were different results? The foods might be more expensive... but maybe not if the government funded the research.
We need to keep in mind that the government should be guided by the people. But most people are too busy to be bothered with it (often myself included).

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.